Recently, thanks to the wonder that is the internet, a
certain issue has come to my awareness. No, nothing important like trade bills, or presidential
elections; this issue deals with linguistics,
which sounds like a very dry subject compared to such flashy newspaper-worthy
things.
According to Wikipedia: “Linguistics is the scientific study of language.” (And from here on out please acknowledge that I am talking out of my ass, meaning I am not an expert in any way and am merely running on my assumptions about a complex field—so please correct me when, not if, I am wrong.) That would obviously mean that linguistics isn’t some silly little book of orthographic rules or one person’s interpretation of how you should pronounce certain things (Worcestershire, anyone?). It is scientific. Therefore, linguists must use the scientific method and analyze things critically and do whatever the hell scientists do (does anyone really know?).
According to Wikipedia: “Linguistics is the scientific study of language.” (And from here on out please acknowledge that I am talking out of my ass, meaning I am not an expert in any way and am merely running on my assumptions about a complex field—so please correct me when, not if, I am wrong.) That would obviously mean that linguistics isn’t some silly little book of orthographic rules or one person’s interpretation of how you should pronounce certain things (Worcestershire, anyone?). It is scientific. Therefore, linguists must use the scientific method and analyze things critically and do whatever the hell scientists do (does anyone really know?).
I have also learned, in running around the internet, that all linguists (at least the good ones) are descriptivist. What does descriptivist mean? And what about its not-so-scientific counterpart, the prescriptivist? Well, this video does a good job of explaining.
Basically, descriptivism is the study of language as it has
evolved naturally and the way that it is used. This article will give you a good
idea of the descriptivist mindset (it certainly did for me). Among linguists, there
is no “good grammar” or “bad grammar”, but only hypotheses about language
usages that can, with enough evidence, become conditions of correctness.
The article gives the example of
subject-verb-object order used in English. It is an order rarely broken in
normal conversation and therefore has become a “correctness condition” of
Standard English. That’s not a universal rule, of course—in Latin, which I
actually started taking this year, the standard sentence structure is
subject-object-verb; the subject is nearly always at the start of the sentence
and the verb is nearly always at the end of the sentence, which makes
translations a hell of a lot easier. Other orders are not incorrect, but they
are less common and mostly used for emphasis.
And then you have the prescriptivists.
Ugh.
Those are the dictionaries, the Grammar Nazis, the English
teachers with red pens in hand, who tell you what is correct and what is
incorrect and dictate their arbitrary rules for usage even if they result in
such jarring sentences as “Remember me, who am your
friend”. They are the ones who deride your filthy, illiterate, non-Received Pronunciation way of speech.
Maybe I am bitter after years of dealing with teachers who, through
conspicuous omission, told me that my adherence to nonsensical rules of grammar
(e.g. split infinitives, comma placing, etc.) was more important than my actual
writing, mostly ignoring things like cadence or word choice—you know, stuff
that actually matters in the realm of writing! I distinctly remember hearing
from one teacher a few years ago that my use of quotation marks and commas
(something like that) was a hallmark of my writing and was uniquely mine. That
made me die a little on the inside.
But no matter! Now, we can rise up against the
prescriptivists.
A caveat—yes, we do need a little bit of prescriptivism for
society to maintain its incredible level of literacy and to organize our
sprawling, globalized languages. But there are problems that linguists (and
even I) have noticed with this perspective.
Perhaps most importantly, prescriptivism encourages elitism
by purporting that the dialect of one social class or race is more important
than another’s. Indeed, Wikipedia gives the definition of “linguistic
prescription” as “the practice of elevating one variety or manner of
language use over another”. In American English, this “variety or manner” has
inevitably been that of the upper-class white man. Consider dialects like African-American Vernacular English. Seen by many as a
lazy way of speaking, ridden with slang and grammatical missteps, it is
actually just another dialect that has its own internal logic and grammatical
structures, etc. Yes, you wouldn’t want to use a dialect like AAVE in an
academic paper (it is more suited for a casual setting), but who the hell
cares? Not a descriptivist.
I know, it sounds crazy. When I first heard about this whole
world of linguistics, I was a little unnerved. I was a filthy prescriptivist
for the longest time, advocating for the use of “well” over “good” and “fewer”
over “less”, standing in the way of split infinitives and seeking to normalize
comma usage with a vengeance. But no longer. I’ve learned to unclench myself
and just...
"Let it go, let it go homie" source |
Yes, I still like to distinguish between their, there, and
they’re; yes, I still worry about spelling at times; but I don’t get in a huff
if someone violates one of those hundred million arbitrary rules set in place
by old, white men writing dictionaries three hundred years ago.
Looking at you, Noah. source |
Think you might be one of those filthy prescriptivists? Ask
yourself: do you
- Insist that sentences should never ever oh god please no end in a preposition?
- Say “the plural of octopus is octopodes”?
- Care about split infinitives?
- Think the use of “literally” for emphasis is terrible and represents intellectual decline in our society?
- Hate pop culture words like “bae”?
- Regularly have arguments about the Oxford comma?
- Resist the use of “they” as a gender-neutral pronoun?
- Believe the habitual be is a hallmark of illiteracy despite all evidence otherwise?
- Describe yourself as a “grammar Nazi”?
And so that concludes my poorly-informed spiel about
language and other shit nobody cares about. So let’s get on to this smoothie.
Much tastier than those dirty little prescriptivists. |
Today’s recipe is also from Seriously Delish;
and while smoothies aren’t something I make often, I’m super excited to share
this one with you.
Mostly because of the toasted coconut rim. Just look at
that. Isn’t it charming?
At least a little bit? |
Shockingly, I’ve actually never used toasted coconut in a
dessert before. I know, I know. It’s quite simple to toast coconut, though—just
toss a handful in a nonstick pan and place over medium heat, stirring
consistently until it turns a nice golden-brown. Boom. Toasted coconut. If you
use sweetened coconut, the toasted coconut alone will taste like a macaroon.
But it gets better—this smoothie not only uses toasted
coconut but frozen bananas (perfect for making thick, creamy smoothies) and
coconut water. Do be sure to peel your bananas before you put them in the
freezer, though—don’t be stupid like me and leave them on and expect to be able
to peel them easily while they are about as hard as small, curved bricks.
Here’s the recipe.
_________
Vegan banana macaroon smoothie
Adapted
from Seriously Delish by Jessica
Merchant
Serves
2
Ingredients
354 grams • frozen bananas • 3 medium
360 grams • light coconut milk • 1 ½ cups
366 grams • coconut water • 1 ½ cups
245 grams • nondairy yogurt (see if you can find
coconut yogurt to go with the macaroon theme!) • 1 cup
20 grams • shredded coconut (sweetened or
unsweetened), toasted • ¼ cup
8 grams • vanilla extract • 2 teaspoons
Agave nectar, for the glass
Directions
Combine banana, coconut milk, coconut water,
yogurt, 10 grams • 2 tablespoons toasted coconut, and vanilla extract in a
blender. Puree until smooth and creamy.
To rim glasses with coconut, put a drop of
agave nectar on your finger and rub along the glass rim. Place remaining
toasted coconut on a plate and turn the glass upside down onto the plate. Press
coconut onto the nectar to adhere. Pour smoothies into each coconut-rimmed
glass. Drink up.
__________
Look at that smoothie. Fancy as shit. |
Making this coconut rim has made me want to try the
technique with other little flaky foods. How about...sprinkles?
It's already been done to death and back?? ...Fuck. source |
If you liked this smoothie, check out these other coconut-y
recipes.
Gluten-free carrot bread with cardamom and coconut. It’s
like carrot cake, but healthy!
Chocolate layer cake with chili and coconut. Still one
of my favorite layer cakes on the blog.
Chocolate coconut zucchini cupcakes. Perfect use for
the overflow of zucchini to come.
I love the addition of coconut yogurt. This looks so decadent and healthful! Great recipe!
ReplyDeleteThank you Kennedy! It tastes like dessert in a glass, but is actually pretty healthy :)
DeleteHa! I like to make sure my grammas is correct, unless I am just chatting with friends online or am just having one of those days where spelling isn't top priority :P I am pretty sure though, that I do not tick all the boxes for the prescriptivists, maybe somewhere in between? :P
ReplyDeleteAnyway, that smoothie looks amaziiiiiiing :D And I love the cute little rim on the glass too, t'is charming indeed :D Thanks for sharing! I know a shop that sells cheap coconut milk, so I am sooooorteeeed! :D
I hope you have a lovely weekend ahead! x
Ah, I was mostly saying all that in jest anyway, there is nothing wrong with being a *little* bit prescriptivist! I think linguistics are pretty interesting so I thought I'd share some "fun facts" :P Glad you like the smoothie!
DeleteA mcaroon smoothie sounds awesome! I am a big coconut fan so can't wait to try this! Love the toasted coconut!
ReplyDeleteHope you do try it! very simple but very tasty :)
DeleteAmazing flavours! Bananas and coconut rock together..I can imagine how this would taste. Love the way you decorated it with toasted coconut!
ReplyDeleteI agree, it really is a great combination! Thank you for stopping by :D
DeleteThis smoothie is amazing! That's exactly what I need! Thank you so much for the recipe!
ReplyDeleteLet me know if you like it! :D
Delete